[PATCH] possible stack overflow in lib/libatm

Joerg Sonnenberger joerg at britannica.bec.de
Mon May 2 06:32:46 PDT 2005

On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 05:43:14PM +0800, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> lib/libatm
> 1) guard against possible stack overflow
> 2) guard against possible NULL pointer accessing

The first is ok. I'm not sure I like the others. It is common to
let the caller guard for that, because it has to do that anyway.


More information about the Submit mailing list